One of the most controversial topics of discussion that has surfaced among our communities and news broadcasts for the past several months surrounds vaccination.
While some are celebrating the fact that a COVID-19 vaccine has been created and made available in such a timely manner, in an anticipatory attempt to end our current state of upheaval, others are skeptical. It is by no means unrealistic to question some of the information that has been provided to us regarding safety and efficacy of an agent that is to be injected into our bodies, without long term research and testing.
It is only natural to feel apprehensive about putting our trust into the individuals who, although qualified in their field of expertise, are promoting a product that lacks empirical evidence to support its claims.
A quote from the World Health Organization in 1948 defines health as “a state of complete physical, mental and social well being, and not merely the absence of disease or other physical impairment.”
If we look at our current situation, it is obvious that the majority of the population are living far below what would be considered a healthy life. Precautionary measures, set in place by governing bodies to stop the spread of COVID-19, are taking its toll on many individuals. The implementation of mandatory masks, social distancing, isolation and lock downs have led to a substantial increase in anxiety, depression, suicide and family violence. It is evident that more harm than good is coming out of all of this.
After months of following mandated protocols that we have been made to believe will improve our current situation, the opposite remains true. Numbers and new cases continue to rise as do mortality rates; however, we are not provided with any evidence. What we are being provided with are media reports with one sided views.
Kary Mullis, creator of PCR (polymerase chain reaction — the testing tool which has been used in identifying Covid), regarded it as inappropriate to detect a viral infection. PCR tests do not have a valid “gold standard” (i.e. the most accurate method available) to compare them with; therefore, where is the scientific evidence found of its reliability?
As people living in solitary confinement, are we not entitled to proof regarding such dire statistics?
Ruling bodies have programmed us to sit idly by, waiting for the string to be pulled by the puppeteers, who through manipulation have orchestrated an event far greater than what it appears to be. Numerous videos and articles written by scientific experts with opposing views have been and continue to be removed from social media, robbing us of the freedom to hear all angles. When we hear something continuously, it becomes instilled in us. We become desensitized to reality and begin to believe things that are meant to deceive us.
Let’s consider the fact that keeping small businesses open poses a greater threat to exposure and increase in cases than the big box stores. This is absurd! The number of people going through Walmart, for instance, is going to far surpass a small retail business on any given day.
We have been backed into an involuntary state of vulnerability, of economic disaster, a state where the benefits of conforming outweigh the risks of turning healthy functioning people into mere beings.
Only a corrupt mind, a mind lacking sense, thinks in a manner such as this.
It is irrational to believe that this virus has caused more deaths than anything in history. The number of deaths related to COVID-19 is presently estimated at just over 2.1million. Although this is a great number, it does not remotely compare to deaths associated with cancer in any given year, which were estimated to be 9.6 million in 2018 and a total of 17.9 million from cardiovascular disease (CVD).
It is also important to note that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is grouping pneumonia, influenza and COVID-19 under the acronym “PIC.” Deaths are documented as results of COVID-19, even though pneumonia or influenza was the cause.
Is there a stench of corruption rising? The chain of events leading up to our current circumstances is reminiscent of the late 1800s, when, as a result of a smallpox outbreak, all Ontario residents were decreed to be vaccinated. Refusal resulted in imprisonment, fines and denied access to, for example, education.
A remark attributed to Dr. Druitt in a speech given during the Gloucester Smallpox epidemic, at Goddard’s Assembly Rooms, Gloucester on 25 January 1896 stated, “You may as well try to stop a smallpox epidemic by vaccination as to prevent a thunderstorm with an umbrella.”
In today’s society, we see increased demands on getting annual vaccines as preventative measures to stop the spread of disease. One such vaccine is the flu vaccine. Those with compromised immune systems are highly advised to get an annual flu shot. In doing so, it is claimed that their bodies develop an immunity to the threat of getting infected with a presumable strain at a specific time of year, or should they get it, it will be in a milder form.
The unfortunate truth is that, according to CDC statistics, from the years 2009 to 2020, flu vaccine effectiveness has been more than 50 percent in just three years.
Has there been any research on long term affects of annual immunization? Could some of the diseases developed in aging individuals be attributed to the use of vaccines? And most importantly, if the efficacy rate is so low and people still die after being vaccinated, where do we find the evidence that supports the fact that it is beneficial to anyone but the companies who manufacture it?
This, to the mind of someone who does not receive annual vaccinations and further has not been medically influenced, might be seen as travesty.
With the introduction of an “emergency” experimental vaccine, one that comes with a long list of “possible adverse event outcomes” cited on the CDC website including, death, convulsions/seizures, stroke, anaphylaxis, meningitis, autoimmune disease, Kawasaki disease and vaccine enhanced disease (to name just a few), millions of people are lining up, believing that this will protect them from the threat of contracting the most terrible virus on the face of the earth.
But will it protect us? Is there evidence to support that? Do we want to expose ourselves and our children to something with an end result that can be potentially worse than the thing that we have been trying to fight? Companies have total immunity from legal liability surrounding injury or harm resulting from this vaccine, as does the Food and Drug Administration, something to take into consideration.
In sum, we must recognize that we, as individuals, have the right to make choices based on our personal beliefs and assumptions while respecting other’s difference of opinion without passing judgment. Information comes through various channels and regardless of topic, we will always be subjected to opposing views. Our perception of truth is just that — our perception. Whether we choose to vaccinate or not is dependent on personal choice. It should not be made based on fear, coercion or pressure.
Making choices is simple; living with consequences may not always be.
Image World Health Organization on unsplash
Opinions and information published in The Current, in whatever form, do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Current.