Bike lane bill contradicts experience, science and safety

Opinion

Provincial legislation (Bill 212) aimed at keeping towns and cities from building bike lanes and even forcing some to remove them is bad news for everyone in Ontario, wherever they live. For people who live in the towns and cities directly affected, it will result in more dangerous streets and more congestion. For those who don’t, it introduces a dangerous and false polarization, pitting drivers against cyclists and encouraging dangerous driving. Above: Cyclists on bike lane. Photo: munbaik-cycling on Unsplash

The proposed legislation is not just an urban problem. Rural municipalities and small towns across Ontario have been creating cycling infrastructure because they know cycling reduces traffic, promotes health, reduces environmental damage and promotes tourism. The County of Renfrew has embraced this thinking with its Active Transportation Policy, and a network of roads with hardened shoulders is quickly developing as a result. Municipalities around the County are doing the same with their roads. The Province putting the brakes on bike lanes sends a negative message about these developments.

Cycling is bringing together citizens of all political persuasions, as shown by the huge turnout for group cycling events in Westmeath, Killaloe, Eganville, Braeside and Petawawa. Local businesses are going bike-friendly to attract the growing number of cycle tourists.

Creating a polarized us-versus-them, drivers-versus-cyclists atmosphere is bound to encourage negative attitudes and dangerous driving. Parents sending their kids off to school, commuters getting to work, folks out shopping, seniors touring and exploring new places – all these people have reason to feel threatened by this proposed legislation.     

The proposal has also pitted the provincial government against municipal ones. Having the Province tell towns and cities what they should do is so deeply offensive and makes so little sense that the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) – a non-partisan association of municipal officials – has condemned Bill 212, on which it was not consulted at all before it was introduced. “Bicycle lanes are an essential element of urban transportation planning and road safety,” it wrote in a news release. “Requiring provincial approval would be a significant overreach into municipal jurisdiction.”

“Based on local knowledge and community input, municipalities develop transportation plans that balance traffic flow with planning priorities like active transportation, multi-modal transportation and environmental and health protection.” Local leaders and staff are much better equipped to know local needs than provincial politicians. 

Premier Ford argues that bike lanes cause traffic congestion. Research says they don’t. The City of Toronto has done extensive researchas reported in City Hall Watcher, finding that while bike usage has jumped by as much as 1,000 percent on some streets as a result of bike lanes, travel time for cars has actually dropped on some routes (Adelaide St., University Ave.) and increased only marginally in  others (Bloor and Richmond Streets).  CBC News reports that from New York to Montreal to Copenhagen to Paris, installation of bike lanes has led to rapid growth in cycling and less traffic congestion, as people find cycling an attractive, affordable and safe alternative to driving.

In England, one of the most comprehensive studies on the subject has shown that building roads, on the other hand, actually encourages congestion because it encourages more people to drive. As urban planning expert Lewis Mumford wrote in 1955, “Adding car lanes to deal with traffic congestion is like loosening your belt to cure obesity.” More and better public transportation and more people on bikes are more effective deterrents to congestion.

The growing popularity of e-bikes is bringing a multitude of new commuters to the existing bike lanes as they use them for everyday transportation. This trend is growing quickly and if encouraged by providing enhanced safety for those commuters, will lead to fewer cars on the crowded urban streets as people opt for the faster commute and fewer parking problems offered by an e-bikes.

Since 2016, the Ottawa Valley Cycling and Active Transportation Alliance (OVCATA) has been building bridges of understanding with riders, walkers, local business people, county and municipal staff and political leaders of all stripes. More than 500 local citizens belong to OVCATA and more than a thousand follow our Facebook page. We believe this Bill is a step backward and should be withdrawn in favour of action that truly enhances safety and gets people moving. 

About the author: Ish Theilheimer, of Golden Lake, ON, is a director-at-large and a founder of Ottawa Valley Cycling and Active Transportation Alliance (OVCATA).

3 Comments

  1. Doug Wedel

    Cyclists created their own opposition. Let me explain.

    Cyclists first talked about bike lanes. Then we talked with city officials to get them installed. But we haven’t had the same robust dialogue with drivers. So in effect we kept them in the dark on bike lanes, cycling and their reason for removing bike lanes, car congestion. So it’s no wonder they oppose bike lanes. They haven’t been properly informed about them and now that Bill 212 passed the vote, they have no reason to listen to discussions about their merits or even how to deal with congestion because they are getting what they asked for, removal of the bike lanes, regardless whether this actually fixes congestion or not.

  2. Lynda Burke

    Currently, the city of Toronto has a congestion problem that it needs to solve. Elizabeth Chow, Mayor of Toronto, does not agree with Ford on this issue and since he doesn’t want to openly deal with her or Toronto’s City Council, he is attempting to use Bill 212 to simply dictate the solution. The research showing the many positive benefits of bicycle lanes has been done. and as a result, bike lanes have been implemented around the province (and the world) and people are using them. So why on earth is Ford and his government proposing Bill 212? Logically, why would he try and do away with something that seemingly has so many proven positive benefits, and he does this without consulting with the municipalities and regions?

    Ford has said that he is considering calling an early election. Turning “Bicycle Lanes” into a senseless political issue is simply a ploy to make himself and his government appear “re-electable worthy” to his disgruntled Toronto base that he counts on heavily for re-election. Call your local provincial MP and cry “foul” to Bill 212.

  3. Mary Ann McCrea

    More congestion and accidents from halting bike lanes around the province probably gives Ford (and his like minded developer connections), another weak excuse to build highways through much needed agricultural and environmentally sensitive green spaces, as well as discouraging much needed tourism dollars and growing population in areas outside of Toronto.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top
Comment Rules

  • Please show respect to the opinions of others no matter how seemingly far-fetched.
  • Abusive, foul language, and/or divisive comments may be deleted without notice.
  • In order to avoid confusion in the community, commenters must provide their full name (first and last) and a valid email address.
  • Comments must be limited to the number of words displayed above the comment box.

Verified by MonsterInsights